![]() |
|
Click below to read reflections on the 75th General Convention: Bishop
Councell's Reflections Bishop Councell: Reflections on the 75th General Convention of The Episcopal Church, June 30, 2006
Dear Friends in Christ, "Come and Grow," based on this text from the Letter to the Ephesians, was the theme of the 75th General Convention of The Episcopal Church. Reflecting on the Convention and its actions, I find great hope and great challenge for our Church. I begin with a word of thanks for the diligence and care with which our Lay and Clerical Deputies and Alternate Deputies shared in the ministry of the General Convention. Please read carefully their thoughtful report on the Convention. We owe them a great debt of gratitude for their hard work. I affirm not only their serious engagement with the toughest issues facing our Church today, but also their prayerful, faith-filled and joyous life in community with one another. They took care of business and took care of each other. My informal reports on Convention are posted on the "Bishop's Blog," at our Diocese of New Jersey web site at http://newjersey.anglican.org/bishop/GC20006. My own view of the Convention was limited by the requirements of membership on the Program, Budget and Finance Committee, which developed a $152 million budget for The Episcopal Church for 20072009. Our work began with the adoption of the following mission priorities as an expression of our commitment to Jesus Christ: 1. Justice and
Peace, including the support of the Millennium Development
Goals; The Millennium Development Goals captured the imagination of this Convention. I saw this interest as a sign of our Church turning outward to minister to a suffering world. It was very gratifying to see $924,000 (an amount in excess of 0.7% of income) allocated for projects that will address extreme poverty and other goals. Our Diocese has made that same commitment of 0.7% of our income for the MDGs for the past two years. My own household does the same. I encourage everyone to make this offering for the benefit of the most vulnerable of God's people around the world. It was my privilege to participate in the election of the 26th Presiding Bishop of The Episcopal Church. In Trinity Church in Columbus, nearly 200 active and retired bishops prayed and sang together and sought the guidance of the Holy Spirit in the exercise of this solemn responsibility. The Rt. Rev. Katharine Jefferts Schori, Bishop of Nevada, was elected on the fifth ballot. The House of Deputies concurred with this action. Bishop Jefferts Schori is a remarkably gifted and able bishop. She is a good soul and a strong leader possessed of an extraordinary intellect. I have known her as a faculty member in the College of Bishops and been blessed by her wisdom and insight. Her election, guided by the Holy Spirit, is the fruit of our Church taking women seriously and valuing their gifts and leadership in ordained ministry for the past 30 years. It will be an honor and a pleasure to work with our Presiding Bishop-elect in the coming years. Recognizing that this development represents a challenge for some of our Anglican partners, I nevertheless support our Presiding Bishop-elect in representing our Church among the Primates of the Communion. I celebrate the fact that women bishops of our Church are now members of the three instruments of unity in the Anglican Communion. I ask you to remember Bishop Jefferts Schori and her family in your prayers as she begins the transition to this new ministry as chief pastor and primate of our Church. May the Lord who has given her the will to do these things give her the grace and power to perform them. Much of the energy and angst of this Convention was centered around our resolutions in response to the Windsor Report of the Lambeth Commission on Communion. I believe that the six resolutions that were adopted represent a serious and substantive response to the questions and concerns of our Anglican partners arising out of the actions of the General Convention of 2003. These resolutions are the results of the labors of a strong, diverse and broad center of our Church. They are part of a larger process of listening and of conversation around the Anglican world. They are not the final word, but they represent this Convention's best effort to maintain our historic commitments to our worldwide Communion while, at the same time, affirming the place of gay and lesbian clergy and lay members in the life and ministry of The Episcopal Church. On the final day of Convention, the House of Bishops and the House of Deputies adopted resolution B-033, "On the Election of Bishops." Both the Presiding Bishop and the Presiding Bishop-elect made it clear that it was important for us to adopt this resolution in the proposed language in order for our Church to continue in conversation and ongoing relationship with the Anglican Communion. I believed that B-033, or something like it, represented an expression of restraint that was necessary for the life of the Communion. I voted in favor of B-033. I realize that many view this action as harmful to gay and lesbian Christians. I intend to continue my support of the lives and ministries of our gay and lesbian clergy and members in New Jersey. I understand that some view this and other actions of Convention with regard for the Windsor Report as inadequate. As strongly as I disagree with that assessment, I will continue in respectful conversation with those who take that approach, calling us all to reconciliation through common mission. The next step in the wider Communion is for a group appointed by the Joint Standing Committee of the Primates and the Anglican Consultative Council to assess The Episcopal Church's response to the Windsor Report and assist the Archbishop in the making of a report to the Primates at their meeting early next year. Since the Convention adjourned, Archbishop Rowan Williams has set out his reflections on the Anglican Communion and his view of responsible decision-making within the Communion ("The Challenge and Hope of Being an Anglican Today: A Reflection for the Bishops, Clergy and Faithful of the Anglican Communion.") Archbishop Williams favors the development of a formal Anglican Covenant. Once the language of the Covenant is agreed to, it would be up to each of the 38 Provinces to adopt the proposed Covenant. It might be the case that some Provinces would not be willing to adopt the Covenant. It may be that some churches would be "constituent" members while others would be "associate" members. This new structure will take years to evolve. It will certainly be part of the Lambeth Conference in 2008. In my Address to our Diocesan Convention last March, I said that, "I have hope that our General Convention will respond to the Windsor Report in such a manner that we will continue to love and serve our Lord Jesus Christ with humility and integrity as an autonomous province of the Anglican Communion. To echo something Bishop Dyer said to the clergy last October, I want us to remain a world Communion for the sake of a suffering world. We need one another so that we can show the world that passion lives here; that Jesus lives here. On the day after the General Convention closes, I plan to return to that work and mission, with all my passion, here in New Jersey." I am so glad to come home to New Jersey and get back to work in our Diocese. In the past week I celebrated the 300th anniversary of the founding of St. John's, Elizabeth; celebrated the 25th anniversary of the Rev. Bob Counselman's tenure as Rector of Trinity, Woodbridge; presided at a meeting of our Diocesan Council, at which we heard of a bold plan to challenge all of our churches to support our common mission; attended an exciting, joyous and slightly raucous meeting of our Right Onward Visioning Committee, where we continued to develop a process that will lead to a vision and strategic plan for our Diocese; and accompanied Deacon Johnine Byrer and Hal Murray (from The Church of the Holy Spirit, Lebanon) to lead Bible Study and share the Eucharist and prayer with inmates at the Somerset County Jail. None of this will grab the headlines. But all of it is part of living the Good News of Jesus Christ, together. I invite everyone to "Come and Grow" with the Episcopal Church in the Diocese of New Jersey. The abundant life of Jesus Christ (John 10:10) is among us. We are growing up into Christ. We are seeking his truth in love and we are speaking his truth in love. He will keep us in step with each other. May he continue to nourish us so that we will continue to "grow up healthy in God, robust in love." The Rt. Rev. George E. Councell XI Bishop of New Jersey Clerical and Lay Deputies: Reflections on the 75th General Convention of The Episcopal Church, June 30, 2006 June 30th, 2006 Dear Sisters and Brothers, We, the General Convention Deputation of the Diocese of New Jersey, write to share with you the most compelling events of the intense days we lived through in Columbus. We look forward also to opportunities to speak with you about Convention in person in the days ahead. (A fuller summary of Convention actions is at: www.epischicago.org/ResourceDetail.cfm?CatID=11&SubCatID=34 It was with surprise and great joy that the House of Deputies received the news of the election of the Rt. Rev. Katharine Jefferts Schori, Bishop of Nevada, as the 26th Presiding Bishop and Primate of the Episcopal Church. The House of Deputies consented to her election overwhelmingly, and when she and Presiding Bishop Griswold were escorted into the House she was greeted with a prolonged standing ovation. Like the Bishops who elected her, we in the New Jersey Deputation are impressed with the many gifts our Presiding Bishop Elect brings to her new ministry and look with hope to her leadership of the Church in the next nine years. Another piece of good news is the focus on the Church's mission that underlay so many of the Convention's actions. In particular, the United Nations Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), which seek to eliminate extreme poverty throughout the world by 2015, received support not only in resolutions, but where it really counts – in the Budget the Convention adopted. Following the UN's guideline of giving 0.7% of income to enact the MDGs, resolutions of Convention and the Budget of the Episcopal Church for 2007-2009 include the following:
The Church's commitment to mission was one of the highlights of Convention that we need not to lose sight of in our focus on those events that have garnered more publicity. When asked after her election what her passion was, the Presiding Bishop Elect said, "My passion is for mission because I think that's how we build the reign of God. The Millennium Development Goals give us an image, an icon or a lens, if you will, for how we can build the reign of God in our own day." Last, we need to speak of the actions of Convention in response to the Windsor Report and the relationship of the Episcopal Church with the rest of the Anglican Communion in the wake of our consent in 2003 to the consecration of the Rt. Rev. Gene Robinson, a gay man living in a committed partnership, as Bishop of New Hampshire. Many of you will have already read Resolution B-033, adopted on the last day of Convention, in which the Convention called upon Bishops and Standing Committees to "exercise restraint by not consenting to the consecration of any candidate to the episcopate whose manner of life presents a challenge to the wider church and will lead to further strains on communion." To understand how, amidst great pain, Convention came to adopt this resolution requires looking at the events that led up to it. Earlier, the Convention had adopted several Resolutions in response to the Windsor Report: an apology and expression of regret for having "strained the bonds of affection in the events surrounding the General Convention of 2003 and the consequences that followed." (Resolution A-160); a reaffirmation of "the abiding commitment of The Episcopal Church to the fellowship of Churches that constitute the Anglican Communion" and our desire to "seek to live into the highest degree of communion possible." (Resolution A-159); and support for "the process of the development of an Anglican Covenant that underscores our unity in faith, order, and common life in service of God's mission." (Resolution A-166). While these resolutions generated lively debate and, in some cases, a winding path through the legislative process, they were eventually adopted by wide margins in the House of Deputies. That changed when Resolution A-161 came to the floor of the House of Deputies on Monday, June 20th. This response to the Windsor Report's request for a moratorium on the election of partnered gay bishops stated that the General Convention was "obliged to urge nominating committees, electing conventions, Standing Committees and bishops with jurisdiction to refrain from the nomination, election, consent to and consecration of bishops whose manner of life presents a challenge to the wider church and will lead to further strains on communion." Debate on this resolution was passionate and respectful, but, for many, frustrating. A number of Deputies, including we from New Jersey, hoped to replace the words "refrain from" with "exercise very considerable caution" (language that had appeared in an earlier draft of the Resolution), but time limits on debate made that impossible. Left with voting on what felt to many like a flawed resolution presenting unacceptable choices, the House of Deputies defeated it resoundingly. New Jersey's Lay Deputies voted No unanimously; the Clergy vote was Divided (an effective No vote under General Convention rules). Interestingly, both strongly progressive and conservative dioceses voted against A-161. For progressives it gave away too much; for conservatives, it didn't go far enough. These unlikely bedfellows defeated a motion to reconsider the resolution, led in part by our Deputation, in hopes that the resolution's language against the election of partnered gay bishops could be softened. At Tuesday evening's session, we learned that Presiding Bishop Griswold had taken the unprecedented step of calling for a joint session of both Houses on Wednesday morning, at which time he presented Resolution B-033. In his address, Bishop Griswold spoke of the importance of ongoing conversation with the rest of the Anglican Communion for our mutual conversion. While the resolutions passed to date indicated that desire, he also said, "unless there is a clear perception on the part of our Anglican brothers and sisters that they have been taken seriously in their concerns it will be impossible to have any genuine conversation." Adoption of Resolution B-033, he strongly implied, was necessary if the Presiding Bishop Elect was to have the opportunity to be in conversation with the rest of the Communion in coming years. Bishop Griswold's address is here: www.episcopalchurch.org/75383_76301_ENG_HTM.htm The mood in the House of Deputies was tense as we awaited word on the House of Bishop's action on B 033. We soon learned that though they had debated amendments that would have given bishops and Standing Committees more leeway when giving consent to bishops-elect whose manner of life presents challenges to the wider church, these were not adopted and the Deputies would need to act on the resolution in its original form. As our debate began, Bonnie Anderson, Vice-President of the House of Deputies and its President Elect, informed us that Bishop Jefferts Schori wished to address the House. In an informal vote, Bonnie asked the will of the House, which was overwhelmingly in favor of hearing from our Presiding Bishop Elect. In words similar to those she'd used in the House of Bishop's debate, Bishop Jefferts Schori said, "The resolution which stands before you is far from adequate. I find the language exceedingly challenging, but my sense is that it's probably the best we're going to do today, and at this convention. I am fully committed to the inclusion of gay and lesbian Christians in this church. I certainly don't understand adopting this resolution as slamming the door, and I do think that if you pass this resolution, you have to keep working with all your mind at finding a common mind in this church. I don't find this an easy thing to say to you, but I think this is the best we're going to manage at this point in our history." Her brief words had a great impact on the House and we were in complete silence until she left the hall. (Bishop Jefferts Schori's complete text is here: thewitness.org/article.php?id=1096 Other powerful voices in the debate were those of gay and lesbian Deputies. Not surprisingly, some spoke against the resolution. Others, in obvious pain, spoke in its favor as a necessary, costly sacrifice that might allow our new Presiding Bishop to be a force for change in the conversations of the Anglican Communion. In the end, all these influences led the House of Deputies to adopt B-033 with the support of roughly 70% of dioceses in both the Lay and Clergy orders. The vote of New Jersey's Lay Deputies was Divided (an effective No vote under General Convention rules); the Clergy voted Yes unanimously. However Deputies voted, few completed a ballot without great struggle and pain. This was certainly true of New Jersey's Deputation. Those of us on the floor for the critical votes support the full inclusion of gay and lesbian people in the Episcopal Church; we also desire to remain connected to the wider Anglican Communion and to support the ministry of our Presiding Bishop Elect. In the intense last days of the Convention, we met regularly to discuss our pained struggles with these conflicting desires; to share our frustration and anger at being forced to choose between them; and, not least, to pray. When the vote on B033 was over, we all were in tears and heavy of heart, knowing that however each had voted, we had in one way voted against what we knew to be good while seeking another conflicting good. We know that our actions and the actions of the Convention are troubling to many in this Diocese in varieties of ways. To our gay and lesbian brothers and sisters and their supporters, we offer apology for the deep pain caused by this vote and we offer our commitment to work with our Presiding Bishop Elect towards your full inclusion in the life of this Church. To those who believe Convention's response to the Windsor Report was inadequate, we ask understanding that we went as far as our consciences would allow us -- indeed, perhaps beyond. With all, we seek to be in that ongoing respectful conversation that characterized most of Convention's deliberations and were a mark of grace in the midst of great tension. We are grateful for the leadership of our Deputation Chair, John Goldsack, who reminded us that however much we talked together, we must each in the end vote our own conscience, and for the ministry of our Chaplain, Linda Gaither, who led us in prayer time and again. Mr. John
Goldsack, Esq.* *Voted on A-161 and B-033 Mr. Peter Hausman and the Rev. Phil Carr-Jones had to return to New Jersey before these votes were taken. |
|