|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Right Revered Paul Matthew and his private chapel at 'Merwick' by
Canon Cynthia McFarland
The consecrated building is question is a private chapel in Princeton, New Jersey, part of what was once the Episcopal residence. 'Merwick', the name given to the rather vast house built in 1895, served for a brief period as housing for Princeton post-graduate students. In 1918, it was purchased by the Right Reverend Paul Matthews, then Bishop of New Jersey, as his home. Bishop
Matthews was wealthy in his own right, but became more
so by his marriage to Elsie Procter, granddaughter of
the founder of Procter and Gamble. Elected bishop of
the Diocese of New Jersey in 1915, Paul Matthews and
his family — four daughters and a son — moved
into Merwick after a few uncongenial years in industrial
Trenton in the first years of his episcopate. Alas, Harriet, a bright, lovely, and sweet-natured middle daughter (who seems to have been something of her father's favourite) died tragically of blood poisoning at Merwick, a few days after her seventeenth birthday in December 1922. Within a year, her father had built and consecrated a private chapel, writing a series of prayers to be used there, all invoking Harriet by name. The chapel was a lovely one. The reredos, rood, crucifix, and all the carving were fashioned by an admired wood carver in Philadelphia and the twelve windows by a well-known Pennsylvania designer, Valentine d'Ogries. The oratory was well used: In a 1924 journal, the bishop indicates he celebrated Holy Communion there 62 times in a year — and only 29 times in diocesan services. Although
Bishop Matthews resigned as bishop in 1937 at age 70,
he remained owner of the house until his death in 1954. And so it was, before the first strike of the wrecking ball, that 12 people found themselves in the chapel at Merwick, participating in brief service of secularisation led by the ninth Bishop of New Jersey. What does it mean to 'secularize' or deconsecrate? There is disagreement about that and difference amongst the practice of it†. In the Church of England, the deconsecration of a parish church seems to be more a political matter than a theological one. (It requires an Act of Parliament to secularise a parish church, which seems to clearly indicate that in this matter there is a strong Erastian position taken.) The Church of Rome appears to have no particular liturgy, but assumes that when the altar and tabernacle are removed from a church building, there is a de facto deconsecration. The Episcopal Church in the USA is rare in the Anglican Communion in having a formal liturgy.
In the case of Merwick Chapel, the very building will vanish, so the enclosed space itself will be gone, the ground to be built over eventually with some other edifice. This seems the best solution, if one has a choice, which one rarely does. The very air contained within the walls, suffused with prayers and petitions, is released to the atmosphere. Whatever was marked and delineated by walls and ceiling — whatever we call 'sacred space' — is unbounded and released. In his poem 'Church Going', Philip Larkin comments about a forlorn church building
And that much can never be deconsecrated. _____ †One
can find lively discussions about the whole business
on the internet. Note: This article originally appeared in Anglicans Online on Sunday, 8 May 2011.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
http://newjersey.anglican.org Last updated: 11 May 2011 ©The Episcopal Diocese of New Jersey |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||